Assignments assistance on Leadership Experience @Myassignmenthelp

Question: Write an essay about the leadership experience. Answer: Introduction The range of activities the people undertake as a manager is substantial with the result that the variety of skills needed to succeed is broad. Whenever the literature talks about the term organization two questions may arise in mind as a first reflection- what kind of organization and who is the leader (Mendenhall Osland, 2012). There may be many factors that can lead an organization towards the failure and success, but the leadership role is also significant and crucial in handling organizations. Many executives have a strong vision of where they want to go. According to Daft (2014), self awareness and strong ties between the leadership strategy and strategy of business create a rock-solid foundation for success. There are three common traits that every leader must have to become a prominent leader are being desire to be a leader, full commitment towards the vision and mission of the corporation and integrity. Richard Goyder is one of the well-known business personalities, who hav e been successfully shown his leadership skills as holding the position of Managing Director of Wesfarmers Limited. Since the year 1993, he has contributed towards the growth of this organization in performing different job responsibilities. Now Wesfarmers has grown into one of the largest listed diversified organizations of Australia. In this essay, the leadership skills of Richard Goyder will be discussed. Readers will get an idea about the different layers of his personality and several decisions making approaches which have considered as effective in the success of the organization. Discussion In todays uncertain, volatile, complex and ambiguous environment, leaders will be called upon to deal with multifaceted emerging threats within the context of the global environment. Leaders will be required to understand, learn and adapt certain requirements by the perfect execution of their duties. According to Goleman et al. 2013, unique characteristics and leadership style of a person identifies capabilities to being lead an organizations through difficult and challenging environment to solve complex business problems. In this discussion, the document will discuss the characteristics and style of leadership of Richer Goyder. Since the over hundred years, Western Australian farmer cooperative, known as Wesfarmers has been engaged in diverse business operations include super markets, hotels, liquor, hotel, convenience stores and so on. Now the company has become one of the largest private sector employers of Australia where the managing directors and his effective team manage around 210000 employees with having the base of stakeholders of nearly 500000. Under the guidance of Richard Goyder, the company satisfies the need of consumers through the provision of goods and services on a competitive and provisional basis. His journey has been started since 1993, when he joined Wesfarmers, after working several commercial roles at the organization of Tubemakers of Australia Limited. After held several numbers of commercial positions in the department of Business Development of Wesfarmers, such as GM, Richard Goyder was appointed as managing director of this company in 1999. He has overseen the purchase and transf ormation Coles, driven Bunnings to its pre-eminent position of market, shepherded this diversified corporation through the GFC and since then the company ensured Wesfarmers shareholders a better than market return. The story of Wesfarmers proves that the success of the organization is completely depends on good management or more accurately, good leadership, irrespective of what industry the business is working in. In one of the recent interview of this influential leader, Richard Goyder relied about the model of Wesfarmers that in retail business, you want a very strong service culture; in a mining business you want a very strong safety culture. There are differences and not a lot of synergies (Re Rule 2016). He believes in operating under a concrete business structure, prioritizing the appropriate business model. During the phase of Wesfarmers move to acquire Coles, many industrialists and market participants of Australia have made several controversial comments because though Coles was a great brand, but that organization was plagued by a notorious history, unlike the company like Wesfarmers. However, Richard Goyder was confident that he and his team could definitely make Coles better and more importantly good returnable organization. Richard Goyder is one of the few competent leaders who have successfully qualified as remarkable. His decision making abilities clearly identify his leadership traits such as a string level of confidence and an optimistic thinking approach. Today Coles has achieved a remarkable position in the Australias grocery supply chain market after the combining efforts of the management team of Wesfarmers. His confidence is contagious. Employees of Wesfarmers are naturally drawn towards seeking an advice, and feel more confident as a result (O'Connell Gibbons, 2016). Ho wever, the best thing about Richards leadership traits is taking responsibility wherever proven wrong and quickly acts to improve the situations within his authority. For instance, Richard Goyder has criticized the decision of Federal Government for having created a two-tiered business tax system. The government said that small business will get 1.5 percent cut off since the year of 2013. Richard firmly argued saying that this was completely wrong to have a different tax structure for different sized business. This incident proves his great level of accountability and farm decision making approaches (Ulrich et al. 2013). He believes that CEOs required more than persuasiveness and eloquence to achieve change. His sense of adaptability is very high. For instance, Mr Goyder identified the removal of trading hour restrictions as a much needed change and responded to the Australias competition policies to stay competitive. Now the business adapted the 247 online business culture. My Goyd er said in this context that time is the best judge of the persons leadership. He also said that a leader needs to be aware of challenges and be honest with them. All these comment of Richard Goyder clearly make understood that the organizational leadership of Richard Goyder is full of multi-layered and multi-dimensional. There are many attributes have been identified which gives him a spectacular success for being served as Managing Director of Wesfarmers. Firstly, he does not considered as a ego-centric person because he said that he has surrounded himself with good people. Richard believes in team management and sense of control (Van Wart, 2014). By putting 25000 employees under his new leadership team, ate now ready to perform what Richard is trying to do to the business. Secondly, many researchers find him a trustworthy and honest leader. He has frankly admitted that he has strengths and several weaknesses. This is indeed commendable for employees who are following his foot-ste ps and builds their career path. Thirdly, his leadership has been showcased a remarkable correlation between head office and several diversified sections of Wesfarmers and results a better performance. Believing in combined efforts and ability to take the sensible decision, Richard Goyder has shown his tough decisiveness and strong confidence (O'Connell Gibbons, 2016). Personally Mr. Goyler believes that there is no magical recipe for leadership. However, other business units like Coles, Kmart, Bunnings and many others have identified that he gives enough exposure and the ability to lead without interference. This makes relationship with the head office more integrated and ensure more financial stability. Therefore, the identified leadership traits of Richard Goyder are high confidence, honesty, great accountability and decisiveness and optimism thinking process. There are various types of leadership styles applied in business organizations. These include Laissez-Faire, Autocratic, Participative, Transactional and Transformational. According to Boscardin 2016), leaders of laissez faire lack direct supervisions of staffs and fail to record regular feedback to those under his supervision. On the other hand, Autocratic leadership is all about allows managers to make decisions alone without the interference of others. Under this leadership styles, managers often prefer to possess total authority. Participative leadership style boosts employee morale by allowing employees in their decision making (Ardichvili et al 2016). Under the transformational leadership, the managers provide rewards or punishments to team members based on performance results of employees. Lastly, transformational leadership style completely based on high level of communication from management to accomplish organizational goals (Avolio Yammarino, 2013). Based on the leadershi p styles of Richard Goyder, this can be said that he is following participative leadership style. He believes in employee participation in the decision making of Wesfarmers (Imperial et al. 2016). This gives enough opportunity for employees to show their capabilities and it causes them to feel as if their opinion matters. Under his dynamic leadership approach, the company has participated in various CSR activities. This leadership helps employees to accept organizational changes or ensures high adaptability in their working environment. Therefore, this participative leadership style of Richard Goyder ensures high performance from the side of employees and better place to work with. His leadership skill and approaches learnt that employee participation is most important which can be boost up by providing motivation and encouragement from the effective leadership of managers. Managers need to be developed several areas to become an effective leader (Friedrich et al. 2016). All the good qualities of leadership has identified during the early part of the twentieth century. There are various leadership theories focused on certain qualities which distinguished between leaders and followers (Nichols, 2016). On the other hand, many subsequent theories are looked at other variables such as factors of situational and skill levels. All these below mentioned theories gives priorities on different variables of personalities and can be discussed under the eight major types categories. Based on these leadership theories, the reader can identify the most important areas or attributes of a manager to become an effective leader. Great Man theories assume that the capacity of leadership is inherent. According this approach leaders are born not made. However, this concept is not so realistic and many of the literatures contradict that leadership skill can developed by identifying the specific traits of the personality. The concept of the Trait theories assumes that inherent certain traits and qualities make people better suited to leadership. According to Chan (2016), trait theories help to identify particular personality or characteristics behaviorally shared by leaders. There are many traits are identified by many researchers which makes a good leader. According to Smalley et al. (2016), business and its employees are the reflection of a leader and hence, if leader make ethical and honest behavior, the will follow suit. Therefore honesty is one of the important attributes that needs to be maintained during the critical business functioning. Furthermore, delegating task is an important traits because finessin g the vision of the brand is essential to create an efficient and systematic business model, however, if the leader dont show their trustworthiness towards the team with that vision, then such leader might never progress to the next stage (Mendenhall Osland, 2012). Trait theory explains people who possess particular traits which are key features of leadership however, never reacted as being leader before. In this context this can be said that the key to delegation is defining the strengths of the team and capitalizing on them. On the other hand, an effective communication skill is essential to develop to lead the team from the front not only in order to negotiate business internationally, but also for communicating within the workplace. Furthermore, a healthy line of communication of the leader can create a productive work environment. It often breaks the ice and immediately helps to develop that sense of familiarity. According to the concept of the trait theory, an effective leade r should have the ability to boost their followers. Keeping the level of confidence and assure that it is significant to focus on the large goal is all about the ultimate duty of a leader. One of the common attributes identified in case of leadership is a full commitment to the brand and towards the role of being leaders. This does not give the opportunities of leader to earn the respect but this will inculcate that same hardworking energy among employees. On the other hand, motivating people towards the continued success of the company ensures higher productivity and fine balance between employer-employee relationships. Hence, positive or optimists thinking process is important to develop effective leaders. Several observations emerge from an examination that ranges of individual differences in terms of identified traits and qualities may be considered as essential for building a good leader however, these theoretical leadership attributes could not be sustained consistently across different leadership situations (Avolio Yammarino, 2013). For this reason, many scholars have found out other leadership theories useful to make a leader more influential and efficient. For instance, Contingency theories of leadership mainly focus on what particular leadership styles that must be suited in a most effective manner for any particular situation Chemers, 2014). This style of leadership hardly finds the best suited leadership styles in all situations (Ellyson et al. 2012). Based in this theory, several variables such as style of the leadership, followers quality and aspects of the situation are identified which can be incorporated while developing leadership skills under this theory and ensure the success of the business. Under the usage of Situational theories, the decisions of leaders may choose the best suitable actions depends on the situational variables. If a good leader has a sound knowledge about the different types of leadership styles, then it would be easier for him to use this theory for certain types of situational decision making. For instance, taking a tough decision by the manager for the sake of the benefits of the organization may lead short term loss (Dinh et al. 2014). However the users follow this theory to identify certain types of decision making. Another common leadership theory is Behavioral theories. This leadership approach is completely opposite to Great Man discusses the focus of the actions if leaders. According to this theory, no mental qualities or internal states can be considered. However, learning interest and a sense of adaptability are the behavioral attributes which needs to be identified. These aspects are important which ensures a great success of the business because this leadership helps to maintain the business competitiveness by learning (Carter, 2015). On the other way, those people who are capable of learning can increase their sense of observation and foresee ability and develop an effective leadersh ip style within them. To bring out the ideal leadership qualities, people can follow Participative theories that suggest that that leadership style is ideal when a leader learnt a lesson from the input of others into account. It means that a good leader should not be rigid or conservative towards individual perspectives. Those leaders encourage contribution and participation from the contemporary members and build the more committed culture within the workplace can surely be successful however, if such leader gather inputs from others. If the leader follows this leadership style, then he will surely develop good team management ability where he will certainly allow contribution of employees in decision making (Van Wart, 2014). Additionally, this approach will increase morale of employees and can ensure a better production altogether. On the other way, collaborative team functionality can be practiced by following the Management theories. These transactional approaches mainly focus on the role of organizat ion, supervision and group performance. It indicates that extraordinary leaders take responsibilities for everyones performance, including their own. This leadership approach increases the morale and provides employee encouragement by the system of reward and punishment as well. This approach is common and has already applied by many organizations. On the contrary, theories of Relationship focus to establish a connection between leaders and followers (Summerfield, 2015). According to this theory, an inspirational leader needs to have a sense of awareness, empathy and honesty so that employee can respond in terms of every leaders call. On the other way, this can be said that motivation and inspiration should be provided by the leader to bring out maximum potentialities of the group members. Here an effective leader should give focus on each person to his or her potential. Therefore, high ethical and moral standards are also required in becoming an efficient and effective leader. Therefore, the above discussion clearly indicates that people needs to develop different areas of their personality to become a perfect leader. Based on the qualities of leadership and people need to learn and practice: Individual-assessment: Being an effective leader, he needs to take stock of their personal strengths and shortcomings (Carter, 2015). Knowing the areas of weakness, leader, on the contrary, will delegate people more effectively who have that ability. Sharp perception: Leaders needs to have a clear perception based on which all critical decision making can be delivered by him. This has been noticed that they have an easy level of honest communication with his peers and a detailed understanding of how they are perceived. Responsive attitudes: Being a responsive behavior in knowing the needs of the team and creative practices with organized nature are indeed required to perform as an effective presenter of the team (Chemers, 2014). Organizational knowledge: Leaders need to well-versed about the organizations goals and overall perspective and further they should even know how their team fits into the big picture. Conclusion This essay discussed the different qualities, traits, leadership styles, personality in order to explain the importance of the leadership developments which are all useful information and be followed to become a effective and efficient leader in an organization. In the first section, an influential and inspirational leadership style and characteristics of Richard Goyder are discussed and his multi-dimensional leadership qualities are analyzed. This is found from that discussion that a leader should believe in building a team management within the organization besides the persuasiveness and eloquence to achieve change. Believing on the ability of each team members and clear communication makes the leader and followers relationship more transparent. In the second section, all the areas and the relevant criterias have been discussed which are essential to become an effective leader. By discussing different leadership models, all the required skills and abilities are being discussed such a developing a sharp perception towards the goal of the organization or to admit strengths and weaknesses makes a leader more effective and transformational. References: Ardichvili, A., och Dag, K. N., Manderscheid, S. (2016). Leadership Development Current and Emerging Models and Practices. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 1523422316645506. Avolio, B. J., Yammarino, F. J. (2013). Introduction to, and overview of, transformational and charismatic leadership. Transformational and charismatic leadership: the road ahead. London: Emerald Group Publishing Limited. Boscardin, M. L. (2016). Transforming educational leadership to support personalised learning. Australian Educational Leader, 38(1), 6. Carter, R. (2015). The changing face of leadership: Connecting financial performance with effective leadership. Training Development, 42(6), 10. Chan, G. P. L. (2016). Diffferences in leadership traits between superintendents from traditional and nontraditional career paths (Doctoral dissertation, FORDHAM UNIVERSITY). Chemers, M. (2014). An integrative theory of leadership. Psychology Press. Daft, R. (2014). The leadership experience. Cengage Learning. Dinh, J. E., Lord, R. G., Gardner, W. L., Meuser, J. D., Liden, R. C., Hu, J. (2014). Leadership theory and research in the new millennium: Current theoretical trends and changing perspectives. The Leadership Quarterly, 25(1), 36-62. Ellyson, L. M., Gibson, J. H., Nichols, M., Doerr, A. (2012, January). A Study of Fiedler's Contingency Theory Among Military Leaders. In Allied Academies International Conference. Academy of Strategic Management. Proceedings (Vol. 11, No. 1, p. 7). Jordan Whitney Enterprises, Inc. Friedrich, T. L., Griffith, J. A., Mumford, M. D. (2016). Collective leadership behaviors: Evaluating the leader, team network, and problem situation characteristics that influence their use. The Leadership Quarterly, 27(2), 312-333. Goleman, D., Boyatzis, R., McKee, A. (2013). Primal leadership. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, Massachusetts (2004, paperback edition). Imperial, M. T., Ospina, S., Johnston, E., O'Leary, R., Thomsen, J., Williams, P., Johnson, S. (2016). Understanding leadership in a world of shared problems: advancing network governance in large landscape conservation. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 14(3), 126-134. Mendenhall, M. E., Osland, J. (2012). Global leadership: Research, practice, and development. Routledge. Nichols, A. L. (2016). What do people desire in their leaders? The effect of leadership experience on desired leadership traits. Leadership Organization Development Journal, 37(5). O'Connell, W., Gibbons, D. (2016). At Your Service-Leadership That Truly Inspires. The Journal for Quality and Participation, 38(4), 27. Re, D. E., Rule, N. O. (2016). The big man has a big mouth: Mouth width correlates with perceived leadership ability and actual leadership performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 63, 86-93. Smalley, S. W., Retallick, M. S., Metzger, D., Greiman, B. (2016). Analysis of Leadership Perceptions, Skills and Traits as Perceived by Agribusiness and Industry Professionals. NACTA Journal, 60(1a), 43. Summerfield, e. (2015). Learning leadership for complex environmental problems. Ulrich, D., Zenger, J., Smallwood, N. (2013). Results-based leadership. Harvard Business Press. Van Wart, M. (2014). Dynamics of leadership in public service: Theory and practice. Routledge.